Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
To verify the results, a comparison with existing models was performed.
The highest R2 value from the existing models was shown to be 0.42 (Kwak et al. 2002), whereas the proposed model generated an R2 value of 0.82. Figure 2i and j demonstrate that the proposed model outperformed the existing models in estimating the shear strength of LS-SB-H beams.
However, the difference in AUC between our novel model and existing models was not statistically significant, despite being compared within the data set for which the new model was developed.
Similar(57)
First, the existing models are proved wrong by the facts.
That, along with the efforts to squeeze improved performance from existing models, is what the industry is currently all about.
Significant deficiency of some existing models is revealed.
However, most existing models are based on smooth surface.
Advantages of this approach over the existing models are discussed.
None of the existing models is representing the indirect land use changes adequately[32].
Additionally, the existing models were mostly unable to accurately predict the shear strength of SFRC beams.
Unfortunately, the existing models are incapable to give a rigorous quantitative estimate of the transmission coefficient.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com