Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(39)
People want to know why American intelligence was so wrong about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Given some of the stories that politicians themselves have peddled to the public, including the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, such concern is understandable.
"The Americans, who wanted to find a link between Saddam and al-Qaida or prove the existence of weapons of mass destruction or find evidence of genocide.
The governors met hours after Lord Hutton had published his report criticising the BBC over its reporting of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
I am still not sure whether the existence of weapons of mass destruction was the primary motive for the military action.
President George W. Bush took months to argue his case — later proved to be flawed — about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Similar(21)
And when Bush turned his focus to Iraq, even before we knew of his administration's efforts to manipulate intelligence and the non-existence of weapons of mass destruction, I was troubled that he had chosen to move our focus from a country that harbored the men who planned 9/11 to one that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on our country.
"Russia does not have in its possession any trustworthy data that supports the existence of nuclear weapons or any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and we have not received any such information from our partners as yet.
There, he contended, he discovered a black market in backpack-size nuclear weapons, though many weapons experts consider the existence of such weapons unlikely.
"Russia does not have in its possession any trustworthy data that would support the existence of nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said.
Instead its reports have focused on the existence of clandestine weapons development programmes, rather than actual weapons production.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com