What need is there of proving the existence of something he already knows exists?
To explain why something exists, we standardly appeal to the existence of something else.
Polonetsky noted the existence of something he called the theory of creepy.
And I am starting to believe a little, the existence of something higher".
"The distinction with prediscovery is that theorists discover the existence of something observers have never seen.
Second, reality is original in contrast to derivative, self-dependent rather than dependent on the existence of something else.
Each sentence signifies the theory's commitment to the existence of something satisfying the rest of the sentence.
Contingent things are not self-complete; they each demand the existence of something else if they are to be explained.
They seem to confirm the existence of something like the long-lost regional, the agrarian and, ultimately, the utopian.
What possible reason could there be for believing in the existence of something in the spatiotemporal world that does not affect anything in that world in any way?
"The existence of something that looks so much like our personalities, but is obviously evolutionarily independent, suggests that having a personality serves an important function".
