exist of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "exist of" is not grammatically correct and should not be used in written English.
The correct phrase is "consist of." Example: The ingredients of this dish consist of rice, vegetables, and chicken.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They do exist, of course.

The New Yorker

Those already exist, of course.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Thedeacon does not physically exist, of course.

The New York Times - Tech

Racism continues to exist, of course.

The Guardian - Opinion

Other possible solutions exist, of course.

The New York Times

Such non-conscious humanoids don't exist, of course.

The Guardian

Examples exist of cooperation between Sunni and Shiite groups.

The New York Times

Such ads do exist, of course, but they are rare.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

You pretend they do not exist, of course.

Independent

A culture used to exist of blaming parents.

Independent

Remains exist of species larger than any of today's lemurs.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "exist of". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "consist of" or "are composed of".

Common error

Do not use "exist of" when you mean "consist of". "Exist" refers to the state of being, while "consist" describes the parts that make up something. For example, say "The team consists of five members" instead of the incorrect "The team exists of five members".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "exist of" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't serve a recognized function in English. Correct alternatives are used to indicate composition or presence. As Ludwig AI states, this usage violates standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "exist of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal and informal writing. As Ludwig AI highlights, standard English does not recognize this phrasing. To express the idea of composition, use "consist of", "be composed of", or "comprise". To express presence, use "exist" alone or other suitable verbs like "occur". Remember, accuracy in grammar enhances clarity and credibility in your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Consist of

Replaces "exist of" to correctly indicate composition or constitution.

Composed of

Indicates that something is made up of certain components.

Made up of

Similar to "composed of", specifying the constituent parts.

Comprise

A more formal way to indicate what constitutes something.

Be comprised of

Similar to "comprise", but in passive voice.

Be present in

Indicates the presence of something within a certain context.

Occur within

Specifies where something takes place or is found.

Lie within

Suggests that something is contained or located within something else.

Happen inside

Informal way to express that something occurs within.

Take place in

Indicates the location or setting of an event.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express composition or existence using the word "exist"?

The phrase "exist of" is grammatically incorrect. You should use phrases like "consist of" or describe existence using verbs such as "to be", "to exist", or "to occur".

Is "exist of" ever grammatically correct in English?

No, "exist of" is not a grammatically correct phrase in standard English. Consider using alternatives like "consist of" or "be made up of" instead.

What can I say instead of the incorrect phrase "exist of"?

Use "consist of", "comprise", or "be composed of" to describe what something is made of. To indicate that something is present, use "exist" without "of".

Which is correct: "exist of" or "consist of"?

"Consist of" is correct. "Exist of" is not grammatically accepted in standard English. Replace "exist of" with "consist of" for accuracy.