Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(59)
If heterogeneity existed, a random effect model was used for meta-analysis; otherwise, a fixed effect model was chosen.
When heterogeneity did exist, a random-effect model based on the method developed by DerSimonian and Laird was employed [ 11].
When high levels of unexplained statistical heterogeneity exists a random effects model to account for heterogeneity is more appropriate, or may even indicate that meta-analysis is not appropriate.
If heterogeneity was existed, a random effects model was performed.
If heterogeneity existed, a random effects model was adopted; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used.
If heterogeneity exists a random effects model should be used and/or the clinical appropriateness of combining should be taken into consideration (i.e., is it sensible to combine?).
*The heterogeneity exists; a random-effect model based on the DerSimonian and Laird method or a fixed-effect model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method was used.
If any heterogeneity existed, a random-effects model, which leads to wider CIs than the fixed-effects model, was used for the meta-analysis.
If the I statistic (>50 %) indicated heterogeneity existed between studies, a random effects model was calculated.
When combining studies of this nature for meta-analysis, we assumed that variation existed between trials in both the design and the methodological quality, so we used a random effect model to provide a conservative estimate of the results.
Subject identity was considered as a random effect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com