Exact(2)
First, as Harris rightly notes, and I have previously emphasized, there are temptations and other factors that frequently prevent us from properly exercising this capacity.
Research has suggested that exercising this capacity improves children's memory and increases their capacity to memorize.
Similar(58)
If you don't regularly exercise this capacity, it withers.
One can exercise this capacity despite holding false beliefs of all kinds about what one has reason to do.
Since not all cognitively unimpaired adult humans exercise this capacity equally well, then it would seem that not all cognitively unimpaired adult humans have equal moral status.
This is an all-or-nothing capacity and hence may be enough to ground our equal status even if perhaps, in real life, we exercise this capacity to varying degrees.[3] Much has been written about conceptions of well being that rehearse these worries (see Sumner 1996, Griffin 1988).
According to the threshold conception, as it is usually discussed, if capacity C grounds FMS, then any being that has C, regardless of how well it can exercise this capacity, has as much moral status as any other being that has C and this status is full.
In contrast, a scalar conception of moral status would hold that if capacity C grounds moral status, then any being who has C has some status; the better it can exercise this capacity, the higher its degree of moral status (Arneson 1999).
Where do we locate the exercise of this capacity?
Like so many other modern thinkers, Hegel reserved the exercise of this capacity for a minority, a "universal estate" responsible for articulating the general interests of humankind.
Consider a consequentialist view according to which each individual counts for one in virtue of having a capacity for a meaningful life (cf. Railton 1984), or a Kantian view that says that people have an intrinsic worth in virtue of their capacity for autonomous choices, where meaning is a function of the exercise of this capacity (Nozick 1974, ch. 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com