Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Then again, the Tenth Circuit was comfortable finding the opposite to be true when it wrote a month earlier that "corporations can be 'persons' exercising religion".
"Any suggestion that for-profit corporations are incapable of exercising religion because their purpose is simply to make money flies in the face of modern corporate law".
"Any suggestion that for-profit corporations are incapable of exercising religion because their purpose is simply to make money flies in the face of modern corporate law," the court's ruling said.
"Any suggestion that for-profit corporations are incapable of exercising religion because their purpose is simply to make money flies in the face of modern corporate law," Alito wrote, adding that by requiring religious corporations to cover contraception, "the HHS mandate demands that they engage in conduct that seriously violates their religious beliefs".
Similar(56)
The petitioner argued that because a nonprofit corporation and a for-profit sole trader could exercise religion, a for-profit corporation was also able to exercise religion.
Indeed, this Court has recognised repeatedly that an individual may "exercise" religion in virtually every phase of life.
This resulted in the violation of constitutional rights for equal protection and the right to freely exercise religion, the successful lawsuit asserted.
"While the Greens are persons who exercise religion, there is a critical separation between the Greens and the corporation they have elected to create".
The Court takes no position as to whether DF has an independent right to freely exercise religion".To some that may seem like a distinction without a difference.
Article 9 of the Human Rights Act (1998) enshrines for every UK citizen the "freedom to exercise religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance".
When Verrilli said the Court has never found a right to exercise religion for corporations, Alito wondered if there was something wrong with the corporate form that it would not be accorded religion freedom rights.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com