Sentence examples for executive scores from inspiring English sources

Executive scores during the copy phase and drawing scores from the recall phase separated the diagnostic groups [F 1,59)=4.14, P=.05] and [F 1,59)=6.88, P=.01], respectively.

The hypotheses that executive scores as measured by the BQSS would separate diagnostic groups and that executive function would mediate the relationship between depression and nonverbal recall were tested using a between groups design with elderly depressed volunteers (N=31) and healthy controls (N=31).

In addition, the absence of any significant correlation between variations in ToM performances and variations in executive scores indicates that possible impairment of the patients' executive functioning cannot explain the modifications in ToM performances in the postoperative condition.

The composite scores were only computed when at least 3 memory scores (z-memory), 2 executive scores (z-executive) and 6 total test scores (z-global) were available.

Clinical parameters thus included the worst predementia delayed verbal memory scores on the Grober and Bushke test, the worst predementia executive scores on the TMT (time to perform part B – time to perform part A) test, and baseline composite mobility scores.

Conversely, there was no overlap in the worst predementia executive scores between these two groups of converters; the worst predementia substraction score on the TMT was equal to or below 60 seconds in AD MR type converters, whereas this score was equal to or above 65 seconds in vascular MR type converters (52 ± 10 and 181 ± 85, p = 0.009).

A general executive score was derived from a large battery of neuropsychological tests assessing three major aspects of executive functioning (inhibition, updating and shifting).

The WMTB-C central executive score change was significantly greater for the ADHD group.

At its centre are dozens of lickerish TV executives, scores of fruity allegations and one very prurient journalist.

An increasing number of MetS components was associated to lower verbal fluency and z-executive scores (P = 0.04 and 0.02) in women.

Indeed, MacLeod et al. (2010) [ 32] highlighted different psychometric properties of the ANT that could complicate the results found: the relative dependence of the three different networks measurements, the low reliability of the alerting and orienting score compared to the executive control scores, and the high intra-individual variability observed in control studies.