Sentence examples for execution the constitution from inspiring English sources

A week after Lockett's execution, the Constitution Project released its report after one of the most comprehensive examinations of capital punishment in the United States.

Once again, a state is attempting to put to death a man who is clearly ineligible for execution under the Constitution.

The event may also be videotaped after a federal judge in Pittsburgh granted a request to this effect yesterday by lawyers in an unrelated death penalty case who want to use the filmed record to support their argument that state execution contravenes the constitution because it is cruel and unusal punishment.

The three-drug cocktail has long been a questionable form of execution under the constitution, despite its lawful standing.

Only if there is a showing that a provision or its execution conflicts with the Constitution can the court act.

In their Tuesday petition, Glossip's lawyers urged the justices to halt the execution, arguing that the Constitution prohibits Oklahoma from putting to death a person "when there is too much doubt about the integrity of the person's conviction".

In their Tuesday petition, Glossip's lawyers urged the justices to halt the execution, arguing that the Constitution prohibits Oklahoma from putting to death a person "when there is too much doubt about the integrity of the person's conviction". That doubt arose from the testimony of Justin Sneed.

Though the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that some pain during an execution does not violate the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the new combination is sure to revive debates over how executions are carried out.

Apart from permitting Congress to use criminal sanctions as means for carrying into execution powers granted to it, the Constitution left the domain of criminal justice to the States.

Two weeks ago, the court issued another 5-4 opinion to uphold a pending execution in Missouri and said the Constitution does not guarantee a "painless" death.

"Because some risk of pain is inherent in any method of execution, we have held that the Constitution does not require the avoidance of all risk of pain," he said.