Specific (but not exclusive) examples include stress reduction by rapid exchange of mobile genetic elements (or exosomes) in unicellular, and rapid changes in the symbiotic microorganisms of animals.
At all stages analyzed, barhl2 and atoh7 expressions appear mostly mutually exclusive (examples are highlighted with asterisks in Figure 4I-J, N-O), although few cells co-expressing both genes are always visible at the expression boundaries (as indicated by arrows in Figure 4D-E, and 4N-O).
We therefore include these mechanisms only as a way of demonstrating the feasibility and generality of the hypothesis and to provide clear (but non-exclusive) examples of variations which satisfy the underlying assumptions of adaptive improvisation.
We include these mechanisms only as a way of demonstrating the feasibility and generality of the hypothesis and to provide clear (though non-exclusive) examples for the kind of variations which satisfy its underlying assumptions.
(The parenthetical addition is necessary since p1 might entail things that are consistent with q even though p1 and q are mutually exclusive. Example: let p1 be the nearby bird is a finch, p2 be the nearby bird is a bird, and q be the nearby bird is a raven).
The categories are not mutually exclusive; for example, many cognitive theories also propose a neural substrate for the relevant cognitive processes.
These are not mutually exclusive; for example, clusters of symmetric multiprocessors are relatively common.
Note that the five categories are not mutually exclusive (for example, the 16 patients in category 5 are also included in category 2).
These classification categories were not mutually exclusive, for example, a single consultation may have provided care for sinusitis as well as for a wheeze-related illness.
