Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
No exclusions were made based on these conditions.
All unambiguously assigned samples were included in this study; no exclusions were made.
Exclusions were made for those missing albuminuria outcome (n = 1,193), missing dietary recall information (n = 693), and/or missing confounder data (n = 2,020).
Subject exclusions were made on the basis of DNA quality (n = 6), complete genotyping failure (n = 4) and low call rates below 95% (n = 14), leaving a total of 714 subjects in the study.
No exclusions were made.
No study exclusions were made based on quality.
Further exclusions were made after genotyping (see below).
Similar exclusions were made for the AMI and stroke analyses.
The exclusions were made based on order of questionnaire submission.
Exclusions : no exclusions were made based on language or date of publication.
No exclusions were made on grounds of age, gender or coincident pathology.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com