exclusion of liability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "exclusion of liability" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in legal documents, contracts, or disclaimers to indicate that a party is not responsible for certain damages or losses. For example: "The company includes an exclusion of liability clause in its terms and conditions." Alternative expressions include "limitation of liability" and "disclaimer of liability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Definitions | Rights and Licence to Use | Logos and Credits | Display and Removal of Content | Confidentiality | Warranties and Exclusions | Exclusion of Liability | Termination | General | These terms and conditions for content network sharing agreements set out the terms under which you, as a Partner of GNM's Content Networks, agree to share content with GNM.

The Guardian

Subject to paragraph (2), in any Y2K action any written contractual term, including a limitation or an exclusion of liability, or a disclaimer of warranty, shall be strictly enforced unless the enforcement of that term would manifestly and directly contravene applicable State law embodied in any statute in effect on January 1 , 1999 specifically addressing that term.

Cornell University

Others were more critical; academic Vera Bermingham pointed out that the exclusion of liability for "approved scheme" buildings under Section 2 at the time included almost all new houses built within the United Kingdom, although these schemes have been much reduced since the 1980s.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Our exclusions of liability shall not apply to any damages arising from death or personal injury caused by our negligence or that of any of our employees or agents.

The Guardian

LORD NICHOLLS -- Acts of torture and hostage-taking, outlawed as they are by international law, cannot be attributed to the state to the exclusion of personal liability.

The New York Times

Speaking through Iacobucci J., the Court created, and later expanded, a new 'principled' exception to the doctrine to allow the third parties to benefit from exclusions or limitations of liability.

Johns Hopkins University

In addition, some policies impose jurisdictional exclusions which can prove problematic in the cyber context given the increased risk of liability arising from violations outside the country in which the company operates.

Columbia University

Some states do not allow the limitation of liability for certain kinds of damages, so some of these limitations or exclusions may not apply to you.

Yale University

There is also the question of liability.

The New York Times

Live of liability in Jackson's death.

The New York Times

§ 750.67 Scope of liability.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When drafting contracts, clearly define the scope of the "exclusion of liability" to avoid ambiguity and ensure enforceability. Specify exactly what types of damages or losses are excluded.

Common error

Avoid using overly broad or vague language in your "exclusion of liability" clause. Courts may interpret ambiguous clauses against the party seeking to rely on the exclusion, potentially nullifying its effect. Be precise and specific.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "exclusion of liability" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It is commonly used in legal and business contexts to denote a contractual term or legal principle that limits or removes a party's responsibility for certain types of damages or losses. Ludwig confirms its validity in diverse written contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Academia

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "exclusion of liability" is a noun phrase predominantly used in legal and business contexts to specify the limitations or removal of responsibility for potential damages or losses. While Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, it is relatively rare. Its usage spans across news, academic, and wiki domains, reflecting its importance in formal and professional discourse. Understanding the nuances of this phrase is crucial for drafting precise and enforceable contracts and agreements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limitation of liability

Focuses on reducing the extent of responsibility rather than complete removal.

disclaimer of liability

Emphasizes a formal renunciation of responsibility.

waiver of liability

Implies a voluntary relinquishment of a known right to hold someone responsible.

exemption from liability

Highlights the state of being free from responsibility.

release from liability

Suggests being freed from an existing obligation.

immunity from liability

Implies a protected status against being held responsible.

non-liability clause

Refers specifically to a contractual provision denying responsibility.

indemnity exclusion

Focuses on excluding the obligation to compensate for losses.

hold harmless agreement

Describes an agreement where one party agrees not to hold the other responsible.

safe harbor provision

Indicates a legal provision that protects parties from liability under specific conditions.

FAQs

What does "exclusion of liability" mean in a contract?

In a contract, "exclusion of liability" means that one party is not responsible for certain damages or losses that may arise. This clause aims to limit the financial risk of one party in case of specific events or breaches.

What are some alternatives to saying "exclusion of liability"?

You can use alternatives like "limitation of liability", "disclaimer of liability", or "waiver of liability" depending on the specific context.

How can an "exclusion of liability" clause be unenforceable?

An "exclusion of liability" clause may be unenforceable if it's too broad, ambiguous, violates public policy, or is obtained through fraud or duress. Courts often scrutinize these clauses and may strike them down if they are deemed unfair or unconscionable.

What is the difference between "exclusion of liability" and indemnity?

"Exclusion of liability" aims to prevent a party from being held responsible for certain losses, while indemnity is an agreement where one party agrees to compensate another for specific losses or damages. They serve different but related purposes in risk allocation.