excluding when vital for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluding when vital for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not included unless it is essential for a particular purpose or situation. Example: "The policy applies to all employees, excluding when vital for health and safety reasons."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Together these data exclude a vital role for Plrx in Plasmodium life cycle progression under standard conditions.

Plosone

However, our molecular genetics data clearly exclude a vital role for Puf1 under normal conditions throughout the P. berghei life cycle.

Plosone

Excluding such vital means of communication will leave the online student interpersonally stagnant and therefore harmed.

The New York Times

Bonds's initial February 2009 trial date was delayed at the last minute when prosecutors appealed the judge's ruling excluding vital evidence.

The New York Times

Are there circumstances when it is vital for a trauma victim to remain conscious?

The New York Times - Science

What needs to be considered is how such thinking can result in a stalemate for progress―because it excludes a vital counterpart needed to propelling us towards the institutional and social changes we strive for.

Huffington Post

For O3, the p-value varied between 0.6853 when excluding 1984 and 0.2241 when excluding 1989.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Therefore to omit religion is to exclude something vital about the human condition.

The Guardian

Some 2% of patients were excluded because their vital status was not known when the data were extracted for analysis on 2 November 2002, a further 3% because their duration of survival was zero or unknown, and another 3% because the melanoma was not their first invasive primary malignancy (data not shown).

British Journal of Cancer

Finally, 1.6% of patients were excluded because their vital status was unknown on 5 November 2002, when the data were extracted for analysis.

British Journal of Cancer

Approximately 2% were excluded because their vital status was unknown on 5 November 2002, when the data were extracted for analysis; 4% because the laryngeal cancer was not their first primary cancer and another 4% because their survival was zero or unknown, most of whom were registered from a death certificate only.

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "excluding when vital for", ensure the context clearly defines what makes something 'vital'. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the justification for the exception.

Common error

Avoid using "excluding when vital for" as a blanket exception without specifying the criteria for 'vital'. This can weaken the rule or guideline you're setting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluding when vital for" functions as a qualifying phrase, introducing an exception to a general statement. It specifies circumstances under which the exclusion does not apply, indicating a condition that overrides the standard rule.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "excluding when vital for" serves to introduce specific exceptions to a rule or guideline based on the critical importance of certain situations. While grammatically correct, its usage is nuanced and requires careful consideration to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity. Ludwig indicates that this is a usable phrase but there are no direct matches in the provided data, alternative phrasing may provide a more appropriate option.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

except when essential for

Replaces "vital" with "essential", offering a slightly different emphasis on necessity.

unless crucial for

Substitutes "vital" with "crucial", highlighting the critical nature of the exception.

excluding only when critical for

Adds "only" for emphasis and uses "critical" as a synonym for "vital".

excluding when absolutely necessary for

Adds "absolutely" to strengthen the necessity of the exception.

save where necessary for

Uses "save where necessary" to indicate the exception, which is a slightly more formal tone.

excluding in circumstances crucial for

Highlights the importance of the circumstances that justify the exception.

apart from when indispensable for

Replaces "vital" with "indispensable", adding a stronger sense of requirement.

unless it is imperative for

Changes the structure to focus on the imperative nature of the situation.

except if fundamentally important for

Replaces "vital" with "fundamentally important", providing a more descriptive alternative.

except in situations vital for

Rephrases to emphasize the situations that warrant the exception.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "excluding when vital for" to sound more formal?

You can use more formal alternatives like "save where necessary for", "apart from when indispensable for", or "except in situations vital for".

Is it grammatically correct to use "excluding when vital for" in a sentence?

Yes, "excluding when vital for" is grammatically correct, but it is crucial to ensure that the context clearly defines what makes something 'vital' to prevent ambiguity.

What's a simpler way to say "excluding when vital for"?

Simpler alternatives include "except when essential for" or "unless crucial for". These options maintain the core meaning with less formality.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "excluding when vital for"?

This phrase is appropriate when establishing a general rule or guideline and specifying exceptions only when something is absolutely necessary or critical. For example, "The policy applies to all employees, excluding when vital for health and safety reasons."