Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
"Excluding this one".
Excluding this result: 2.1%.
I'm not excluding this.
"I exclude this absolutely.
However, even when this first point is excluded, this relationship is not significant (t(1,48) = −0.147; p = 0.147), so there is no evidence to support a relationship between disparity and realism with the small disparity range.
Finally, we cannot exclude a disparity between the "objective" exercise intensity in the two environments (water versus land), despite a similar "subjective" intensity of exercise perception (RPE), as suggested by Killgore et al. 44 In summary, both warm-water and land-based activities, performed at the same RPE, were beneficial in maintaining strength and in improving lower-body flexibility.
When preventable deaths (e.g. those caused by smoking) are excluded from the analysis, however, this disparity diminishes.
Even if we exclude housing wealth, disparities are stark.
In all the selected health professional categories (nurses excluded) pronounced distributional disparities present between the public and the non-public/private sectors - provision overwhelmingly favouring non-public/private sectors, though varyingly so.
This disparity is untenable.
This disparity needs redress".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com