Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
However, there are no validated methods for excluding qualitative studies from syntheses on the basis of quality.
All studies that satisfied the relevance criteria were included because there is an increasingly strong case for not excluding qualitative data studies from evidence synthesis based on quality assessment[ 1, 18, 19].
However, given that there were no accepted – or empirically tested – methods for excluding qualitative studies from syntheses on the basis of their quality [ 57, 12, 58], we included all studies regardless of their quality.
Similar(57)
Given that recent literature reviews on physical activity in urban parks deliberately excluded qualitative findings, we reviewed qualitative research on this topic informed by a published classification scheme based on quantitative research.
The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and excluded qualitative studies and non-original research.
We excluded qualitative studies, case reports and studies addressing the political experiences of participants.
The strict study design criteria excluded qualitative studies which form a rich part of the literature in this field.
It also excludes qualitative studies that explore how individuals shape their views about nanotechnology and associated actors through discussion, although these generally support the results described below.
We excluded qualitative studies of "withdrawal from dialysis" or studies that focused solely on quality of life with dialysis or transplant.
To rate newspaper stories on how they quantified results, we included only journal articles with straightforward quantifiable outcomes (that is, we excluded qualitative studies, case reports, biological mechanism studies, and studies not using an individual unit of analysis).
Excluding these qualitative differences, we found a very high correlation between the two sub-communities (0.90 Pearson correlation coefficient, p = 0.005).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com