We ran sensitivity analyses excluding facilities with a high level of missingness and for PM2.5 adjusted from ground-based monitors.
The next stage of reform was the 2001 2002 transition of water facilities (excluding facilities of national importance) from national to communal ownership, as well as assigning the local level with the authority to manage them.
We first stratified all such facilities in each country by region, and then chose study facilities randomly, excluding facilities that were too difficult to reach or that were the focus of other adherence-related initiatives.
Stock-outs during the 3 months prior to survey occurred across facility levels for HIV test-kits in 55%, 26%and9%9% facilities in Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe respectively; for CPT in 58%, 32%and9%9% and for PMTCT drugs in 26%, 10% and 0% of facilities (excluding facilities where patients were referred out for either drug).
In our data, at the end of the study period, the main consumption patterns of services included facility services (32%), commuting services (26%), in-home services (8%), and mixed services (i.e., more than one of the categories mentioned previously, excluding facilities) (30%).
In addition, as the inclusion of hospitals that did not discharge AIs/ANs potentially impacted our analyses, we reran our models using a larger sample size which included these excluded facilities.
We excluded facilities that did not provide antenatal or delivery services (n = 5).
From this sample, we excluded facilities (and corresponding providers) that did not provide antenatal, delivery, or newborn care (n = 78).
Among the excluded facilities, 18 of 31 (58%) implemented automated eGFR reporting with a similar median time to initial implementation (1.6 years), while the remaining facilities did not implement.
We also excluded facilities that did not have a provider interviewed who personally provided one of these types of care (n = 5 additional facilities excluded), resulting in a total sample of 455 facilities and 1357 providers.
