excluded to have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded to have" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express a concept related to exclusion, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "He felt excluded to have been left out of the decision-making process."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Despite reforms of the House of Lords, the state continues to allow this unelected group from which women are excluded to have a voice in the parliamentary process.

The Guardian

"I've dedicated all my efforts to have the poorest, the ones most excluded, to have access to musical education.

The New York Times

In Fig. 1, two articles have published in advance in 2014 are excluded to have full year account of 48 articles from 2008 to 2013.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

In these analyses, patients receiving NAC or AC were excluded to have a more clear impression of how NLR values have an impact on the natural history of disease.

British Journal of Cancer

All control patients were definitely excluded to have rectal carcinoma by optical colonoscopy (n = 17), optical rectoscopy (n = 8) or by follow-up evaluation, including clinical examination and pelvic MR imaging (n = 6).

Cancer Imaging

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Nulliparous women were excluded to exclude those who might have had polycystic ovary disease, a known risk factor for diabetes.

Diabetes Care

In addition, all patients diagnosed since 2004 were excluded, to exclude patients likely to have been treated with trastuzumab.

British Journal of Cancer

The unit was the only one of four divisions — excluding Time Warner Cable — to have revenue growth in the fourth quarter.

The New York Times

We analyzed the results by excluding them to have all African-american cohorts.

Plosone

Data from magnetically disturbed periods (Kp > 3.5) have been excluded to reduce possible storm-related effects.

Earth, Planets and Space

An additional participant was excluded due to having undergone DBS-surgery between administrations.

BMC Geriatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "excluded to have". Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "excluded from having" or "not allowed to have" to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing.

Common error

Don't confuse "excluded to have" with correct constructions. Remember, exclusion typically requires a preposition like "from" or a different verb construction altogether. For example, use "excluded from having" or "prevented from having" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded to have" functions as a connector indicating purpose or reason, though it is grammatically questionable. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not correct. The intent is to convey a sense of being prevented from possessing or experiencing something.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "excluded to have" is an attempt to convey a reason for exclusion, but is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is not correct. While it appears in a mix of science and news media contexts, its usage is infrequent. Therefore, it is best to use grammatically correct alternatives such as "excluded from having" or "not allowed to have". These alternatives ensure clarity and maintain grammatical integrity. For formal communication, avoid "excluded to have" altogether.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not allowed to have

A simple and direct way to express a lack of permission. Less formal.

barred from having

Focuses on prohibiting someone from possessing or experiencing something. Stronger emphasis on the act of preventing access.

prohibited to possess

Emphasizes the forbidden nature of possessing something. More formal and legally oriented.

prevented from accessing

Highlights the act of stopping someone from gaining access. Suitable when access is the key issue.

restricted from using

Focuses on limiting the use of something. Applies when usage is the concern.

denied the opportunity to have

Highlights the missed chance or opportunity. Emphasizes the loss of a chance.

ineligible to possess

Emphasizes a lack of qualification or suitability. Applies when eligibility is the issue.

not entitled to receive

Emphasizes a lack of rightful claim. Applies when entitlement is the issue.

disqualified from owning

Implies a formal removal of the right to own something. More legalistic.

precluded from obtaining

Focuses on the impossibility of getting something. More formal and absolute.

FAQs

What's a grammatically sound alternative to "excluded to have"?

Instead of "excluded to have", use phrases like "excluded from having" or "not allowed to have" for correct grammar.

Is "excluded to have" considered correct in formal writing?

No, "excluded to have" is not considered correct. Use more appropriate alternatives such as "prevented from having" in formal contexts.

How can I rephrase a sentence using "excluded to have" to make it clearer?

Replace "excluded to have" with clearer alternatives like "barred from having" or "restricted from having" to improve clarity and grammatical correctness.

What's the difference between "excluded to have" and "excluded from having"?

"Excluded to have" is grammatically incorrect, while "excluded from having" is the correct form. The preposition "from" is necessary to properly connect "excluded" with the gerund "having".