excluded to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers, as "excluded" typically requires a different preposition, such as "from." Example: "Certain individuals were excluded from the meeting due to their lack of relevant experience."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nothing like feeling excluded to make a gal prickly.

The New York Times

Owners, but Excluded To make matters worse, U.S. Sugar announced in April that it was eliminating its dividend.

The New York Times

Despite reforms of the House of Lords, the state continues to allow this unelected group from which women are excluded to have a voice in the parliamentary process.

The Guardian

Other invertebrate species were excluded to reduce data variance.

Environmental Sciences Europe

28 of the higher profile cases were excluded to try and avoid recollection bias.

European Journal of Hybrid Imaging

Data from magnetically disturbed periods (Kp > 3.5) have been excluded to reduce possible storm-related effects.

Earth, Planets and Space

Wetlands larger than 1.5 ha were excluded to ensure sampling effectiveness.

Ecological Processes

In addition to this, all TWA workers are excluded to define regular employment.

IZA Journal of Migration

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews were excluded to avoid overlapping of results with original articles.

Annals of Intensive Care

For all the sampling procedures, the 3 border lines were excluded to avoid border effects.

Rice

The dominant migrating components are excluded to better highlight the smaller nonmigrating components.

Earth, Planets and Space

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "excluded to" in formal writing. Replace it with grammatically correct alternatives like "excluded in order to" or "omitted to" to ensure clarity and precision.

Common error

A common mistake is using "excluded to" when intending to convey purpose. While prevalent, it's grammatically incorrect. Always use "excluded in order to" or another appropriate construction. For example, instead of "Data was excluded to reduce variance", write "Data was excluded in order to reduce variance".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded to" functions as a purpose connector, attempting to link an action (exclusion) with its intended outcome. However, it's grammatically flawed, as highlighted by Ludwig AI, which notes that it's not a standard English expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

81%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "excluded to" appears frequently, particularly in scientific and news contexts, it's considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as a non-standard expression. To maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy, it's best to replace "excluded to" with alternatives like "excluded in order to", "omitted to", or "not included to", depending on the specific purpose you're trying to convey. Even though the expression is very common, relying on better alternatives will drastically improve your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

excluded for the purpose of

Expands the original phrase to explicitly state the reason for exclusion.

excluded in order to

Emphasizes the intention behind the exclusion, similar to the original phrase but grammatically sound.

not included to

Directly states that something is not included, indicating a deliberate choice.

omitted to

Replaces "excluded" with "omitted", maintaining the purpose-driven context.

not considered to

Indicates that something was not taken into consideration, implying exclusion from the analysis or process.

left out to

A more informal alternative using "left out" to convey exclusion.

removed to

Highlights the action of removing something for a specific reason.

avoided to

Focuses on avoiding a certain outcome or situation by excluding something.

rejected to

Implies a more forceful exclusion, suggesting that something was actively rejected.

disregarded to

Suggests that something was ignored or dismissed for a particular purpose.

FAQs

Is "excluded to" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "excluded to" is grammatically incorrect. A more appropriate construction would be "excluded in order to" or alternatives like "omitted to" or "not included to".

What are some alternatives to "excluded to"?

Alternatives include phrases such as "excluded in order to", "omitted to", "not included to", or "removed to". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Why is "excluded to" considered grammatically incorrect?

The preposition "to" typically indicates direction or purpose, but in the context of exclusion, it doesn't logically connect. The correct phrasing requires a more explicit expression of purpose, such as "in order to".

How can I use "exclude" correctly in a sentence?

Use "exclude" with prepositions like "from". For example, "They were excluded from the meeting." To indicate purpose, use "excluded in order to", such as "Certain data points were "excluded in order to" improve the accuracy of the analysis."