Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

excluded suitable for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded suitable for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express that something is not appropriate or applicable for a certain context, but it lacks clarity and grammatical structure. Example: "The criteria for selection excluded suitable candidates based on their lack of experience."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Our laboratory expects to scan one plant every 7 minutes, making the current mesh-based methodology (3D reconstruction excluded) suitable for high-throughput dicotyledonous plant analysis.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

However, the parameters without an actual limiting function could be treated as limiting in SDM and may exclude areas suitable for the target species outside the native range from a natural history point of view.

Science

Plosone

The study will exclude men suitable for curative treatment, but who choose to be monitored until proof of further progression (active surveillance).

Science

BMJ Open

In contrast, both of the amino endoperoxides (12) 2′-OMe and hydroxy endoperoxide (14) OH displayed high toxicity to normal breast cells MCF-10A, and therefore were excluded as suitable anticancer candidates for further studies.

This could be of value in choosing the 'landing site' for implantation or to exclude patients not suitable for transplantation.

The criteria in the first tier are used to exclude studies not suitable for QRA and should be applied to all HOS considered for QRA (Table 1).

That may per se cause errors when projecting SDMs into new areas, since suitable areas may be excluded although being physiologically suitable for the target species.

Science

Plosone

Patients were excluded if they were suitable for further radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or other systemic anticancer medication or had participated in a previous blinded study involving gefitinib.

We excluded patients who were only suitable for one of the interventions, or had declined surgery.

Science

BMJ Open

Because of the mentioned criteria 52 subjects were excluded and 508 patients were suitable for data analysis.

Seven hundred consecutive patients were identified, of which 125 were excluded as they were not suitable for readmission.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using the grammatically awkward phrase "excluded suitable for", rephrase your sentence for clarity. For example, use "excluded because they were suitable for..." or "deemed unsuitable for" to better convey your intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "excluded suitable for" when defining exclusion criteria. Instead, clearly state the reasons for exclusion, focusing on specific disqualifying attributes or conditions. For example, specify "excluded due to pre-existing conditions" instead of "excluded suitable for treatment".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded suitable for" functions as an attempt to describe a situation where something is rejected or not considered, despite possessing qualities that would seemingly make it appropriate. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "excluded suitable for" is grammatically incorrect and its use is not recommended. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is incorrect. Although examples exist within scientific and news contexts, these instances do not validate its use. It is advisable to use alternative phrases such as "deemed unsuitable for" or to restructure the sentence to clearly express the intended meaning, focusing on the specific reasons for exclusion or unsuitability. To improve clarity, avoid using this expression and prefer more accurate and grammatically correct alternatives.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "excluded suitable for" to be grammatically correct?

To correct "excluded suitable for", consider using phrases like "excluded because suitable", specifying the reason for exclusion, or "deemed unsuitable for" if the intent is to indicate inappropriateness.

What is a clearer alternative to "excluded suitable for" when describing selection criteria?

Instead of "excluded suitable for", be explicit about exclusion criteria. For example, use "excluded due to age" or "not eligible because of" followed by the specific reason.

Is "excluded suitable for" considered proper English?

No, "excluded suitable for" is not considered proper English. It is grammatically awkward. Using phrases like "considered inappropriate for" or restructuring the sentence for clarity is recommended.

What does "excluded suitable for" attempt to convey, and how can I express it better?

The phrase attempts to convey that something was not chosen despite fitting certain requirements. To express this better, use phrases like "rejected despite being suitable" or "disregarded as fitting", which more accurately convey the intended meaning.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: