Sentence examples for excluded comparable from inspiring English sources

Our method achieved both high sensitivity and specificity for detection of retinal arteries: a sensitivity of 0.7929 (unclassified vessels included) or 0.8758 (unclassified vessels excluded) comparable with the methods from other groups, and a specificity of 0.93, higher than that reported by Saez et al. and Relan et al. [ 12, 33].

When W lineages were excluded comparable effect sizes emerged, but were non-significant probably due to the resulting low sample size (dS at contact residues of the ABS: r = 0.318, F1,16 = 1.799, P = 0.199; dN at non-contact residues: r = 0.480, F1,16 = 4.800, P = 0.043; dS at non-contact residues: r = 0.307, F1,16 = 1.667, P = 0.215).

For women recruited in England, hospital records were available only from 1997; however, the small difference in relative risks in Scotland suggests that not excluding comparable women in England would have a minimal effect on our estimates.

The age, gender, and education of the 91 patients who were excluded were comparable to those of the 153 participants who were finally included in the data analysis.

The subset of women we excluded was comparable to the study population; for example, their mean age was identical (74.3 years) and average BMI was very similar (28.8 vs. 29.2 kg/m).

Third, a number of data pairs were identified that skewed trends considerably from the central tendency, which led us to exclude a comparable number of extremely low (e.g., < 0.6 year) and extremely high (e.g., > 10 year) half-life values.

Baseline characteristics of the excluded infants/episodes were comparable to those of the included ones.

Although the excluded students were comparable in socio-demographic terms, their average tariff point scores were lower.

However, included and excluded subjects were comparable in terms of sex, grade and regions (Cohen's d [ 22] = 0.12 for sex, 0.15 for grade and 0.09 for regions).

Patients admitted to critical care units in Northern Ireland were also excluded because a comparable measure of socioeconomic position was not available.

The excluded subjects were comparable to the study population, except for a higher percentage of subjects over 95 years of age; no deaths were observed in this subgroup.