"excessive extraction" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It describes the act of removing or taking out something in an excessive or extreme manner. Example: The company's excessive extraction of natural resources has caused irreparable damage to the environment.
Demonstrators accuse the company of creating major water shortages through excessive extraction of water and of polluting groundwater and soil.
Thus, our findings represent a rare instance where excessive extraction of natural resources, recognized to be detrimental for biodiversity, is also the primary driver for resettlement.
Excessive extraction of groundwater is known to be the main cause of subsidence in most case.
Some disadvantage of these methods were fraction of oxidation, hydrolysis, and ionization due to excessive extraction time and relatively higher temperature (Duarte et al. 2010).
Wairakei, New Zealand has suffered the most well-known reported case of subsidence caused by excessive extraction of geothermal energy and subsequent reduction of groundwater, leading to ground-surface settlements as large as 15 m [2].
In the context of increasing depletion in groundwater resources, mainly because of excessive extraction without adequately knowing groundwater resource availability and distribution, this paper discusses a GIS-based approach to estimate spatial distribution in groundwater storage volume and proposes a GIS-based ARC model to delineate potential areas for groundwater development.
Rivers and lakes are the hardest hit habitats, with animals populations down by 81% since 1970, due to excessive water extraction, pollution and dams.
Mismanagement has caused the overexploitation of one third of the major aquifers in Mexico, mainly due to excessive water extraction for agricultural irrigation.
West of the Mississippi River, grassland streams are naturally stressed by low precipitation and high evapotranspiration and further subjected to excessive water extraction.
Western investors may find that earlier foreign investment strategies that exploited opportunities for excessive resource extraction and ecological degradation, and did not benefit the people through productive employment generation, are less likely to be accepted – not least because now more alternatives are available.
This suggests the beginning of a recovery resulting from recent coordinated societal responses to control excessive water extraction in the catchment, highlighting the need for continuing long-term monitoring.
