Exact(3)
Histopathology exams were evaluated for the presence of inflammatory focus.
A total of 71 consecutive patients (75 exams) were evaluated in this retrospective study.
First, the PET/CT exams and the PET/MRI exams were evaluated for the presence of PET-positive and PET-negative (suspicious for tumour) lesions.
Similar(57)
Student performance on exams was evaluated similarly, with questions designed to test student ability to solve problems rather than simply repeat basic concepts.
Nonetheless, the limitations of these studies include the small sample size, the exclusion of lymph nodes (LNs) less than 2 mm, and an incomplete radiological-histological one-to-one comparison, as not all the LNs identified on pathologic exam were evaluated on CT images.
The total ED associated with the combined PET/CT exam was evaluated as the sum of the PET and CT ED values.
The overall total score on the final exam was evaluated using ANOVA between the nonflipped and flipped conditions.
Score distributions of exam discomfort were tested for normality using the Shapiro Wilk W test and significant differences in discomfort between different exam types were evaluated using a two-sided Student's t-test.
Learning artifacts, such as BC homework and optional exam questions, also were evaluated.
For patients with multiple results (those who had undergone more than one colonoscopy in the time period considered) the endoscopic exams performed within 6 months from the first one were considered as complementary to the initial examination and they were evaluated as one exam for the purpose of the analysis.
Phylogenetic trees generated by introductory biology students during the group component of the evolution unit exam (n = 23), individual section of the final exam (n = 77), and group component of the final exam (n = 22) were evaluated in terms of style, conventionality, and accuracy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com