In the examples we compare the meso-micro relations for the homogeneous matrix with those derived for the heterogeneous matrix.
After presenting illustrative examples, we compare the properties of the streamer-related events with those of general population of prominence events.
Using numerical examples, we compare the performances of the EWMA charts with Shewhart ¯¯¯¯¯X and S charts, and investigate the sensitivity of the chart parameters to changes in process parameters and loss functions.
In our examples, we compare the author Muharram23 against the author Brother4ever.
As the last set of examples, we compare ESPRIT-SB to the conventional ESPRIT implemented on the entire (real) array, i.e., without subarray beamforming.
By taking numerical examples, we compare the convergence speed of our schemes (Kirk-multistep-SP iterative schemes) with the others (Kirk-SP, Kirk-Noor, Kirk-Ishikawa, Kirk-Mann and Kirk iterative schemes) for this class of operators.
By providing some examples, we compare the results with exact solutions and conclude that HPM is more accurate, more stable and effective and can therefore be found widely applicable in structrue engineering.
Moreover, for finite examples we compare our method to a global analysis, i.e. where in each step the entire state space is considered.
In the first two examples, we compare the effects of missing data and small sample size with the number of conflicts and quality of consensus mapping.
For example, we compared brain tumor infiltration and organ distribution of naïve and activated lymphocytes in single animals.
