Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
In the examples we compare the meso-micro relations for the homogeneous matrix with those derived for the heterogeneous matrix.
After presenting illustrative examples, we compare the properties of the streamer-related events with those of general population of prominence events.
Using numerical examples, we compare the performances of the EWMA charts with Shewhart ¯¯¯¯¯X and S charts, and investigate the sensitivity of the chart parameters to changes in process parameters and loss functions.
In our examples, we compare the author Muharram23 against the author Brother4ever.
As the last set of examples, we compare ESPRIT-SB to the conventional ESPRIT implemented on the entire (real) array, i.e., without subarray beamforming.
By taking numerical examples, we compare the convergence speed of our schemes (Kirk-multistep-SP iterative schemes) with the others (Kirk-SP, Kirk-Noor, Kirk-Ishikawa, Kirk-Mann and Kirk iterative schemes) for this class of operators.
Similar(51)
In both empirical examples, we compared the performance of LMM, beta GLMM, and beta GEE model.
In our first example, we compare our method to the popular dual-porosity technique.
For example, we compare each submission against a code database, which includes all submissions from this offering and previous offerings of the course.
As a numerical example, we compare an 11.424 GHz multilayered structure using 4 layers and an 11.424 GHz conventional single-layered structure.
In this example we compare the exact and simplified solution techniques and demonstrate how the idealizing assumptions can be justified a posteriori.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com