Taking the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) as an example, we argue that its interpretive results are objective, can be validated, and produce scientific knowledge comparable to that generated by more widely accepted methods.
For example, we argue that in example (7) below (where Hood marked FR in bold and FD in italics), although 'social actions and interaction' and 'organizations of the conversations' belong to the real world which is being investigated, the rest of the sentence assesses the methodology of the research itself.
For example, we argued that since biological regulatory networks are sparsely connected, the matrix A should be sparse.
With the examples presented, we argue that knowledge does exist to help system design facilitators address these basic issues.
Using several real world examples, we further argue that, fractional order control is ubiquitous when the dynamic system is of distributed parameter nature.
For example, we often argue about the fact that they want me to accept the first job that comes my way – they make me feel that the projects I am working on are a waste of time.
In this example, we can argue that both interference constraint and per-interface constraint and their corresponding link prices and interface prices, respectively, play crucial roles in the fair rate control of multi-radio multi-channel wireless ad hoc networks.
Perhaps, for example, we can argue that The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster's "pastafarians" actually help keep our country religiously free.
For example, we will argue below that which measures frequency for the haplotype 100 among females in the current generation can be accurately approximated by the haplotype frequency 100 in the "maternal generation" or previous generation of females.
But the authors admitted that: "[such] positive examples are too few, and we argue that immediate action to protect the world's remaining wilderness areas on a large scale is now necessary, including in global policy platforms".
