The basic concept of "development" is subdivided into two concepts: "individual development" and "evolutionary development".1 These recent examples seeking to enhance the coherence of biology education also view evolution as a central theme.
Should the party, for example, seek to nationalize the election?
It could, for example, seek to make society more equitable – so that more people can afford to eat well.
No definition is provided for such conduct, and so what is there to stop this broad term from encompassing those who, for example, seek to split up the UK, block the renewal of Trident, or take Britain out of the EU?
Indeed, these seemingly opposing positions are not mutually exclusive; one could, for example, seek to distance oneself from perceived corrupt political machinations, find meaning in spiritual pursuits, and engage in political renewal.
Missionaries around the world, of whom evangelical Christians are the most prominent example, seek to convert others to the "one true" path.
(Would Alderman Burke, for example, seek to hold the Mayor's former chief of staff in "contempt of Council"?) Moreover, neither offers journalists any real ability to obtain documents from OCOG -- which, its bosses frequently remind us, is a private organization.
The British, for example, sought to fashion not an egalitarian community of nations but a successor to their own rule.
In 2004 Downfall, for example, sought to develop the idea that not all Germans were fanatical Nazis.
