The relational ontology of the capabilities approach can extend to capabilities that are often thought of as properties of individuals, including, for example, capabilities to develop refined self-awareness and identities.
This subset could include, for example, capabilities to reason, to feel and respond to emotion, to intend and initiate action, to be self-aware and self-directing, to experience particular kinds of suffering and so on, and capabilities to participate socially in a group or community of beings that recognizes each other as having significant ethical privileges.
For example, the capability to speak makes one always vulnerable to speaking erroneously, or misleadingly, or inappropriately.
For example, laboratory capability to safely detect this virus should be evaluated.
In principle, however, many capabilities can be recognized as widely valued some, including for example the capability to be well nourished, because they are deemed essential for human well-being and/or are foundational for many other capabilities.
Examples are the capability to catalyse urease that is encoded by seven genes on contig 1225.
He also said the technology (for example the cameras' capability to stitch together 360-degree footage) is advancing quickly, even just in the past few months.
As our example of the capability to prepare meals for family members illustrates, situational and relational issues interact dynamically with any particular impairments or talents individuals have been born with or acquired.
For example, incorporating the capability to predict the mechanistic impact of additional cellular processes, such as signaling and transcriptional regulation, at the genome scale in human tissues presents additional, significant challenges.
For example, TC8, the capability to review and monitor a patient's health and modify treatment accordingly, was considered important by 96.6% of practitioners without overseas experience, compared with only 78.9% of practitioners who had less than 10 years overseas experience and 71.9% of practitioners who had 10 years or more overseas experience (p <0.001, Table 3).
