If you're a pet owner who uses Google Photos, you've probably typed in "dog" or "cat" before in order to surface photos of your furry pal – like anytime someone asks you about your pet, for example, which clearly means they would like to see a picture of Mr. Fluffypants.
Then, I will bring up this example, which clearly shows this.
Numerical examples which clearly illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed optimization procedure, as well as the comparison with other methods, are presented.
Example 20 We provide a simple "academic" example, which, nevertheless, clearly presents the advantages of using optimal data sets and emphatically points out the issues related to the use of term orders.
Figure 1 shows an example (which is clearly a simplification), focusing only on gene associations.
Also, although the revised rule does not explicitly recognize exceptions within the rules themselves, the restyled rule recognizes that other rules might permit, for example, video teleconferencing, which clearly involves "broadcasting" of the proceedings, even if only for limited purposes.
We have several examples of each, which clearly demonstrate that a reply from the GP alone is not sufficient to prevent over-volunteering and that it can falsely incriminate a volunteer.
Manning and Raghavan provide an example in [2] which clearly demonstrates the functionality of cosine similarity.
Unlike, for example, a Bordeaux label which clearly states a) which chateau produced the wine, b) what cru, or growth, the wine is (i.e., Premier Cru, Grande Cru, etc)., c) what kind of wine it is (Pomerol, St. Julien, Montrachet, etc).
This is just another example which shows very clearly that the different markets in Europe are not really or hardly comparable with each other.
Think of how much life can be injected into animated cartoon characters, for example, which are very clearly not human yet are hugely popular because people find them entertaining and feel they come alive in their own way.
