Exact(2)
For example, contributors will not only tag their paper with the scientific field, but must also mark it as "New Results," "Confirmatory Results," or "Contradictory Results," depending on whether it is an advance or confirms or contradicts previous experiments.
For example, contributors in Thailand, Norway, and New Zealand all suggested "making the bed".
Similar(58)
Here are some examples: Contributor Kelly Phillips Erb is working with us on an e-book about what parents should know about filing taxes.
For example, new contributors may give "new" structures to PubChem that were known already for some time.
For example, most contributors use the terms 'ownership' and 'possession' synonymously; sometimes they are distinguished, though it is not clear how.
For example, some contributors submit work-in-progress patches, and some reviewers avoid explictly rejecting patches (what Jeong et al. called "gentle rejection").
For example, one contributor from a small business bluntly emailed: 'If British plastics SMEs address social and environmental issues when there is neither short nor medium term gain, they will go out of business.' Such harsh realities do not chime with the absolutism of the business case or the moralisers.
For example, one contributor suggested simply comparing performance levels with that of peers and ignoring private sector competitors will no longer cut it: "This sort of benchmarking is a bit like an ugly dogs competition – you are just comparing ugly dogs without realising there are good-looking dogs out there".
In 2014, for example, Forbes contributor Lucie Lapovsky wrote that well over one-half (57 percent) of undergraduates at four-year institutions were women, while at the same time just slightly more than one quarter (26percentt) of campuses were led by women presidents.
In the compilation work The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer edited by William Irwin, Mark T. Conrad and Aeon J. Skoble, the episode is cited as an example where contributor Raja Halwani writes: "Homer is a habitual liar, he lacks honesty".
In case of using a research instrument, a questionnaire for example, a contributor is expected to include it in an appendix.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com