The LCM model allows preferences to vary between respondents, assuming that an individual's decisions depend on factors that are both observed (for example, job attributes and socio-demographic characteristics) and unobserved (for example, attributes and perceptions about a specific job) [ 34– 34].
In the animal communication literature, developmental work has tended to focus on the acoustic channel on its own: song learning in songbirds is the classic example, and vocal perception in frogs is also garnering interest (Baugh et al. 2012).
They can also analyze transitions across attributes, for example, performance and perception, and probe queries like what proportion of high achievers perceive a certain classroom activity as engaging.
For example, knowledge and perception of risks were promoted through teacher explanations and stories, class discussions, a drama serial performed by peer educators, and condom promotion.
For example for OIPP, OIPP predicts perceptions and perceptions predicts enrollment.
For example, high levels of competition and perceptions about how scientists are assessed for jobs and funding are reportedly contributing to a loss of creativity in science, less collaboration and poor research practices.
Some of these factors may be the same as those known to influence parental decision making in relation to other issues such as fever management [ 15, 16], health promoters [ 17], intention to breast feeding [ 18]; for example, knowledge, attitudes, social referents, and perceptions of control.
Previous studies have revealed that such barriers include structural factors (for example, the cost of services) and attitude factors (for example, negative perception and prejudice against mental disorders) [ 13, 14].
So, for example, perception and inference more exotic candidate sources, too are defended as veritable knowledge-generators by the observation that people commonly regard them in that way.
For example, leveraging perception and motion manipulation to power self-driving cars is fascinating.
