Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
A significant gender difference in agreement was also obtained when examining studies using only self-generated fantasy as a stimulus:.87 (95% CI,.62 to 1.12) for men (4 samples, n = 75), and.08 (95% CI, −.07 to.23) for women (7 samples, n = 197).
Similar(59)
Here we examine studies using circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for metastases, markers for tumour recurrence and response to clinical treatments.
The gender difference was smaller and no longer statistically significant when we examined studies using a contiguous method of assessing subjective sexual arousal, due to a lower degree of subjective-genital agreement for men.
The following review examines studies using the double-coil protocol to assess CBI in healthy adults.
If we examine only studies using this technology, three studies using the ThinPrep Imager all gave unsatisfactory rates of 1.5%214142 similarlar to other ThinPrep studies included in this review.
This will be examined in future studies using a control group and using more quantitative approaches.
Thus, our findings should be examined in future studies using prospective designs.
The ORR study was examined using an Autolab potentiostat/galvanostat PGSTAT30 (Eco Chemie BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands).
The data of this study are examined using recent matching techniques.
Heterogeneity of effects by study was examined using two different methods.
All embryos in this study were examined using TLM.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com