Table 5 examines the estimated costs derived from the multivariate regressions.
Putting (q=2) in Theorem 1 and considering the equalities (B_2=frac{1}{6}) and (B_4=-frac{1}{30} B_4=-frac{1}{30}the estimands for (n=1) direxamining gethehestimatesng result.
For monthly series from (79), with (delta left( Bright) =left( 1-Bright) left( 1-B^{12}right) ), wexaminene the estimates in the corresponding version of (80).
In any case, it would be prudent to examine the estimates using few other values of M and (M_{tau }) to confirm their stability.
We examined the estimates for heterogeneity by gender.
We examined the estimates of latency as calculated for best fits of our models.
It would be helpful to examine the estimates for some of these countries on a case-by-case basis to see if some of them should be replaced.
We examine the estimates by using a validation step where unobserved phenotypes in an independent validation set are predicted.
The genetic component (A) was comparatively small but significant for the majority of intake measures examined; the estimates from full ACE models are therefore shown in Table 4.
