This article examines stakeholder experiences with integrating treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression within primary care clinics in the U.S. Army, the use-of-care facilitation to improve treatment, and the specific therapeutic tools used within the Stepped Treatment Enhanced PTSD Services Using Primary Care study.
Hence, this paper examines stakeholder influences and risks in SSCM, as addressed by conceptual frameworks, empirical studies, and formal models to shed light on the trends and gaps in qualitative and quantitative SSCM research.
This study examines stakeholder perspectives on services for youth with concurrent disorders including 1) clinical issues in youth services; 2) priority system issues; and 3) optimal knowledge translation strategies to enhance researcher-stakeholder communication.
To our knowledge, this is the first national study to examine stakeholders' views on the implementation of accreditation programs.
This study sought to examine stakeholders' views on the appropriateness of using decision aids, in general, to support advance care planning among high-risk surgery populations and the design of such a decision aid.
This study builds on the findings of our previous qualitative study which examined stakeholders' views about conditions needed in general for the establishment of successful clinical networks, that is without the benefit of hindsight or reflecting on impacts that had occurred [ 8].
In the present case, two key stakeholder models are examined: stakeholder saliences based on power, urgency and legitimacy and a stakeholder model based on social issue management valences.
In sum, while some studies have attempted to empirically examine stakeholder perspectives, these studies are characterized by methodological limitations, which impacted the generalizability of the findings.
Secondly we examine stakeholder groups beyond highly published scientists and people attending nano conferences/working in nano laboratories that had previously been surveyed to include academic, government and business stakeholders.
The ultimate benefit of examining stakeholder positions on health research in a systematic manner is to develop effective systematic strategies to influence these stakeholders to support the transfer of evidence to policy and implementation.
