Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
The HRCT examinations were randomised and reviewed by two radiologists (E.B and M.C) with more than 15 years of experience in general and thoracic radiology who were unaware of clinical or functional findings.
Similar(59)
After the examination, participants were randomised individually to the intervention group or control group (treatment as usual).
After neuroophtalmologic examination, eligible subjects were randomised into two groups.
In order to reduce the impact of stress on the examination results pigs were randomised into different groups at the age of four weeks and accustomed to handling over a one- to two-week period prior to aerosol infection.
After providing written, informed consent, patients were randomised into two examination groups according to a randomisation list stratified on centres and balanced every four patients.
Students were randomised using simple randomisation.
The women were randomised to start the examination by either a stationary colposcope or the Gynocular.
The immunolabelled slides were randomised and masked for blinded examination, which was performed independently by three observers (LM, SI and YM); when there was disagreement (<5% of the slides), a consensus was obtained using a multi-head microscope.
Students were randomised to the control group, participating only in the current physical examination course, or to the intervention group, which received the new course in addition.
Participating women were randomised to receive either (1) screening with annual mammography, breast physical examination, and instruction on breast self-examination on four or five occasions, or (2) community care after a single breast physical examination and instruction on breast self-examination.
800 patients who were attending the emergency department for abdominal pain were randomised to undergo or not undergo surgeon-performed ultrasound as a complement to standard examination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com