In the 10-/11-year-olds 10-/11-year-olds 10-/11-year-olds 10-/11-year-oldsor the vICCal examination method as compared to the intra-oral photographic assessment methods.
A method comparison analysis was performed using Stata® version 11 to determine the 95% limits of agreement for all five examiners, comparing the visual examination method with the photographic assessment method using 8, 6 and 4 intra-oral photographs [ 14].
A representative sample of 335 primary schools children in grades 3 to 5 were first examined using the direct clinical examination method.
A protocol (Additional file 2) prepared by the examiner and based on his standard examination method was filled out for each patient and assessed as described in the protocol.
Unlike the photographic method, the replication method showed lower inter-examiner reliability levels than the direct clinical examination method (Table 2).
A standard oral examination method recommended by WHO [ 36] was used to examine: (a) the extra-oral, head and neck areas; and (b), peri-oral and intra-oral soft tissues using a criteria described by Greenspan et al. [ 37].
The parts involve in the frequency of inspection, the examination requirements for each inspection, the examination method are included.
MRI is an important medical technology, which is considered to be the first choice of examination method when diagnosing and evaluating spinal metastatic tumors.
The data resulting from the examination method applications.
The present study utilized an examination method using silicone [11, 12, 16].
However, this conventional visual examination method is time-consuming and often provides inaccurate result.
