Recent examinations corrected some errors about their locales.
The main 'steps' or aspects for analysis include incidence in the programme area, patients' awareness of TB, their motivation to seek care at a health care delivery point, selection of TB suspects by a health professional, appropriate examination carried out, sensitivity of the examination, correct treatment, regular treatment taken by the TB patient and effectiveness of the treatment [ 17].
The examinations performed on both eyes included the following: slit-lamp microscopy, thorough three-mirror lens fundus examination, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, noncontact tonometry, and noninvasive spectrophotometric retinal oximetry.
On examination, best corrected visual acuity in the right eye was 6/6; N6 and left eye was counting fingers close to face.
On examination, his corrected visual acuities were 6/12 and 6/6 in the right and left eye respectively.
Age at examination was corrected for prematurity where birth was before 37 weeks gestation and age <2 years.
On ophthalmic examination best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye with small refractive error.
Twenty-four to 48 h before CSGM, global cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) corrected for educational levels of patients (13).
Similarly, in a German meta-analysis, the German high school GPA, which is mandatory for student selection, showed the strongest association with academic success in the first two years of medical school (r =.58 with examination marks, corrected for reliability of the criterion and restricted range) [ 9].
Examination of corrected item-total correlations for those items that were perceived by the authors as conceptually redundant (i.e., items 10, 11, 12, & 13) along with correlations between those items and social desirability scores resulted in the removal of item #11 ("I am confident that I can maintain my attention").
The authors declare that they have no competing interests TK and DD performed the surgery and were involved in drafting the manuscript; AS, DP and SK organized the patient's data and figures and helped to draft the manuscript; KE carried out the histopathology examination; GK corrected and contributed to the final version of the manuscript; TK wrote the manuscript.
