Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In case of non-overlapping windows the count distribution is exact except for the approximations in the calculation of the co-occurrence event.
Similar(59)
Of those with mycobacteremia, 10 (55.6%) had positive baseline sputa for acid-fast bacilli, and 17 (94.4%) met the study definition of confirmed tuberculosis and 1 (5.6%) met the definition of probable tuberculosis at week 12.> -wrap-foot> aFisher's Exact test, except for age, CD4 count, HIV RNA, and BMI which were exact Wilcoxon test.
There were non-significant trends in participants with M. tuberculosis bacteremia being more likely to have HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL at week 48 (p = 0.062) and experiencing CD4 count increases ≥100 cells/mm at week 48 (p = 0.059).> -wrap-foot> aFisher's Exact test, except for age, CD4 count, HIV RNA, BMI, sputum smear and culture conversion which were exact Wilcoxon test.
However, w ~ and m ~ are defined as bit strings, and for any decoder (blind or non-blind), they should be an exact estimate except for a few bit errors that can be handled by error correction codes.Further, as shown in Figure 2b, the detection function in the watermark decoding invokes the extraction function, once the detection is completed.
P values are by Fisher's exact test except for mean age comparison by Mann-Whitney.
‡p values used Fisher exact test except for body mass index, which used Student t-test.
P values were calculated using the Fisher's exact test, except for *chi-square test for trend.
Among these ten modules, nine are statistically enriched (P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test, except for other processes).
a by Fisher's exact test except for tumor size and lymph node metastasis; by the chi-squared test for tumor size and lymph node metastasis.
Data presented as n. a P values were calculated using Fisher's exact test, except for age where the Mann-Whitney U test was used.
Eight out of nine functional modules are statistically enriched beyond what is expected by chance (P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test, except for other processes).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com