Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
Meta-regression analyses were not attempted for ex smoking.
For CB, RRs are higher for mortality for both current and ex smoking, but the differences by continent seen for current smoking are not evident for ex smoking.
m Current and ex smoking excluded because no matching pair of relative risks available.
n Current and ex smoking excluded because only available relative risks did not satisfy age criteria.
l Current smoking excluded because no ex smoking relative risk available.
o Ex smoking excluded because no current smoking relative risk available.
Similar(35)
Prevalence of ex-smoking was 26%.
Smoking status was classified as current, never or ex-smoking.
Thus, it may not be surprising that ex-smoking has long-lasting harmful effects.
Person-years were broken down into non-smoking, smoking, and ex-smoking years, respectively.
Current and ex-smoking was significantly associated with chronic cough, wheeze, asthma, emphysema and pneumonia.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com