Sentence examples for evolving alignments from inspiring English sources

Again, rapidly evolving alignments are much more likely to be adult- or testis-specific (30%and11%1% in rapidly evolving vs. 21% and 6% overall, respectively; χ P < 0.01; fig. 4) and much less likely to be ovary-specific (9% in rapidly evolving, 16% background; χ P < 0.01; fig. 4).

We also examined the proportion of genes that fall into each of these expression categories across 1) all alignments and 2) the most rapidly evolving alignments (i.e., d N/d S = 2.0 for the per-read analysis or d N/d S = 1.0 for the whole gene analysis).

What is the effect of the varying performance of the rapidly evolving alignment and analytical tools?

Phylogenetic artifacts phylogeny asymmetries, long-branch attractions, and unequal codon and base composition biases among the bacterial clades were accounted for by conducting the same coevolution analyses in a set of neutrally evolving simulated alignments, which bear the same evolutionary features as the real sequence alignments.

The evolving geopolitical alignments in the region have potentially far-reaching geostrategic consequences for India, and New Delhi is eager to blunt growing Chinese and Pakistani influence over the island.

Thus, despite not obviously fast evolving, here the alignment methods may have failed to identify homologous positions correctly.

This signature is also commonly referred to as sequence conservation, which in the comparative genomics context is detected as regions of reduced divergence compared with neutrally evolving regions in sequence alignments.

It is absolutely true that in certain cases gene trees do not reflect gene evolution (i.e. due to recombination, domains fusions, unequal evolutionary rates affecting homology detection and excluding fast evolving sequences from phylogenetic alignments).

The inferred rates maximize the likelihood that all sites in a given multiple alignment are evolving according to a sequence evolution model, which is a continuous time Markov model.

Another approach for reducing the misleading effect of nonphylogenetic signal is to remove the fastest evolving sites from the alignment (Delsuc et al. 2005; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta et al. 2007).

Bias is hardly ever a desirable feature in a method, but we think that as truly coevolving sites are rarely the quickest evolving sites in an alignment, bias towards slowly evolving sites might prove much less harmful than the one showed by Mutual Information.