Sentence examples for evolutionary conclusion from inspiring English sources

The pre-ComX protein sequence comparison analysis between B. licheniformis and other Bacilli lead to similar evolutionary conclusion as Dogsa et al. studies since the percentage identity varied from 20 to 100%.

This evolutionary conclusion indicates that the diverse modern birds are a branch of a much larger avian tree that diverged during the Mesozoic era and that, in turn, all these birds are but a shoot of the majestic tree of dinosaurs.

The most parsimonious evolutionary conclusion would be that in the low-GC gram-positive grouping, acquisition of the ACT domain and narrowed specificity for prephenate preceded narrowed specificity for NAD+.

The comparative studies that have been the building blocks of these important evolutionary conclusions have been greatly assisted by many newly discovered Mesozoic-aged birds (Chiappe 2007), which by possessing many skeletal features that are only slightly modified from the ancestral maniraptoran condition, fill a critical gap in the evolutionary transition toward modern birds (Figs. 1, 4, and 5).

Small wonder, then, that Simpson once proclaimed that "Darwin's collections of fossil mammals could not and did not lead directly to evolutionary conclusions" (Simpson 1984, p. 36 quoted in Brinkman, 2009)—"with the possible exception of the tucutucu-like rodent" which alone among Darwin's mammalian fossils struck Simpson potentially "as ancestral, in an evolutionary sense, to any living species".

These questions are especially important given the obvious impact of nucleotide sequence variation on evolutionary conclusions.

UC provided the microarray experimental facility and revised the manuscript critically for the content of evolutionary conclusions.

We also considered to what extent a more complex model could lead to fundamentally different evolutionary conclusions.

The correct reannotation (partial and pseudogene sequences, fused or not predicted Open reading frame [ORF]), is necessary because it changes the evolutionary conclusions made from global family analyses.

The author criticises (rightly) many problems associated with gene phylogenies and different artefacts affecting phylogenetic reconstruction that can lead to wrong evolutionary conclusions regarding organismal diversification.

Our results indicate that model choice can lead to fundamentally different evolutionary conclusions, emphasizing the importance of more biologically realistic and complex models.