Sentence examples for evolution on the grounds from inspiring English sources

It doesn't come across as especially "progressive"; the science teacher quarrels with the theory of evolution on the grounds that Jesus was not an ape.

Then there was the famous rumpus over Moses and monkeys in Victorian Britain, when some Christians attacked Charles Darwin's theory of evolution on the grounds that it contradicted the Bible.

But, Dworkin suggests, we surely should not think that that this violates their right to freedom of speech: e.g., that creationists have a legitimate claim on the state to ban the publication of books or videos recommending the theory of evolution on the grounds that these may cause the speech of creationists to receive an unsympathetic or dismissive reception.

Creationists commonly argue against evolution on the grounds that "evolution is a religion; it is not a science".

Creationists argue against evolution on the grounds that it cannot explain certain non-evolutionary processes, such as abiogenesis, the Big Bang, or the meaning of life.

Then visit the striking collection of animal skeletons at the Grand Gallery of Evolution on the ground floor of the National Museum of Natural History.

In the early 20th century, some state legislatures in the United States banned the teaching of evolution on the ground that it contradicted the biblical creation story, which they considered a revealed truth.

It is also motivated by the public positions of many scholars who seem to have reservations about evolution but not on the grounds of a creationist Biblical literalism.

Sometimes, this has yielded a comical result, as in Scalia's dissent in Edwards v. Aguillard, a 1987 decision overturning a pretty plainly labelled Louisiana law called the Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act on the grounds that it advanced a particular religious belief.

Although early objectors dismissed evolution as contradicting their interpretation of the Bible, this argument was legally invalidated when the Supreme Court ruled in Epperson v. Arkansas in 1968 that forbidding the teaching of evolution on religious grounds violated the Establishment Clause.

As discussed earlier, the majority had issues with the idea of human evolution on religious grounds, although they recognized the evolutionary relationships among other organisms and accepted their common ancestry.