Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
C1 Business Digest C1 EDITORIAL A20-21 Editorials: H&R blockbuster; the evolution of creationism; in vino, some split-decision veritas.
While "The Evolution of Creationism" (editorial, May 17) is basically sound, I beg that you please, please, please stop referring to "intelligent design" as a "theory".
The evolution of creationism.
Consider "intelligent design," the latest morph in the evolution of creationism.
Even the most dedicated student of the evolution of creationism finds it difficult to stay au courant with every newsworthy event.
According to geneticist Dr. William Thwaites (San Diego State University, now retired), writing about the evolution of creationism on behalf of the National Center for Science Education, "It is a little-known fact that Methodists, Presbyterians, Lutherans, the United Church of Christ, and many other denominations do not believe that Creation occurred literally as described in Genesis.
Similar(53)
Explain that they will be quickly researching the basic ideas behind Darwin's theory of evolution, the theory of creationism, the Archaeopteryx (linking reptiles to birds) and Tiktaalik (linking fish to land vertebrates, such as reptiles).
Nearly half the country rejects the science of evolution in favor of Creationism.
As both acceptance and intention are significantly related to a set of common indicators (knowledge of evolution, creationism, and gender), this relationship is possibly masked.
The implications of this unit are especially relevant to science teacher education in the light of the ongoing national controversy of evolution vs creationism and intelligent design, and in the light of the need to emulate scientific practices in science classrooms through inquiry learning.
Our results show that the relationship between acceptance and intention (without controlling for the set of indicators) can partially be attributed to an indirect effect of the knowledge of evolution and creationism towards intention (mediated by acceptance).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com