While fieriness can be fun, it makes managerial progression much harder, like adopting evil-alignment in an RPG or being Paolo Di Canio.
PRO: you don't have to buddy up with any alignment, killing evil enemies is as natural as killing neutral or good enemies; the same goes for law/chaos.
I think the first major issue that must be dealt with is the alignment of sin with evil.
The alignments are Lawful Good, Lawful Neutral, Lawful Evil, Neutral Good, True Neutral, Neutral Evil, Chaotic Good, Chaotic Neutral, and Chaotic Evil.
Y: Extra magic that you have that you didn't set or that you can set as alternate magic Know your alignment, you get to choose to be good, evil or anywhere in between.
The Europe special edition was split into two separate boxes, dubbed "Lawful Good Limited Edition" and "Chaotic Evil Limited Edition", a reference to the Dungeons & Dragons concept of moral alignment.
Decide whether you want your character alignment to be ethically; "Lawful Good," "Neutral Good," "Chaotic Good," "Lawful Neutral," True Neutral," "Chaotic Neutral," "Lawful Evil," "Neutral Evil" or "Chaotic Evil".
Don't be afraid to bring this to the DM if it is really cutting in to your enjoyment, Chaotic Evil doesn't always work in a campaign and it is best to try another alignment when evil doesn't work well.
Alignment in AD&D which determines a character's ethical and moral perspective on the independent axes of "good vs. evil" and "law vs. chaos"—is a static property, chosen by the player at the start of a game.
