Sentence examples for evidentiary requirements from inspiring English sources

While there are other ways of satisfying evidentiary requirements, witnesses and confessions remain the most common.

But of course, there are laws in place, and they do have evidentiary requirements.

The perceived unfairness of this asymmetry is linked to yet another grievance: although America has yet to ratify the treaty, it is indirectly benefiting from its looser evidentiary requirements.In fact, both ratification and reciprocity are red herrings.

Scientific techniques capable of fixing responsibility of pollution and meeting the evidentiary requirements in a court of law are important in making a polluter pay for the damages he has made to the environment.

To evaluate the current practice of companies and agencies to assess the changes made in aligning regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) stakeholders; to identify areas of commonality of evidentiary requirements that could occur; and to identify strategic issues and trends of regulatory and HTA synergy.

Among its provisions it unleashed the U.S. military in narcotics control operations, enacted capital punishment for some drug-related crimes, loosened the evidentiary requirements in drug trials, and imposed mandatory minimum sentences for the distribution of cocaine.

Some were adopted by the legislature, although a principal evidentiary requirement -- a forensic laboratory independent of all police agencies -- was not.

It would seem the point of the idea is to provide the government with another means to make sure the 100 or so Australians fighting in Iraq or Syria (up to 50 of whom we are told are dual nationals) never make it back to Australia, with a lower evidentiary requirement than last year's foreign fighters' laws, which were in part designed to deal with the same problem.

Given the evidentiary and burden-of-proof requirements of our criminal justice system, it is obvious that any special prosecutor would face exactly the same problem.

"The report contains flawed methodology and applies the lowest imaginable evidentiary standard that barely meets journalistic requirements," the Rwandan government said in an official response.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that according to Afroyim v. Rusk, "Congress is constitutionally devoid of the power" to revoke citizenship; and further, that Congress had no power to legislate any evidentiary standard for proving Terrazas's intent to relinquish his citizenship that fell short of a requirement of proof by clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence.