"evidentiary questions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to questions that are posed in order to obtain evidence. For example: "The lawyer posed several evidentiary questions to the defendant in order to gain enough evidence to prove her case."
Historians have observed that the judge unjustifiably ruled against Hill on evidentiary questions and that the prosecution coached witnesses to say they saw Hill near the grocery that night.
It's hardly far-fetched to assume that the same dynamic applies to judges across the spectrum of evidentiary questions, even those judges who try to put partisanship aside and think they have succeeded.
Thus the goals of medicine and other normative considerations lie just below the surface of these evidentiary questions, and evidence becomes an instrument of, rather than a substitute for, politics.
And because this is an evidentiary question it requires only proof of the conspiracy by a preponderance of the evidence.
So you would bring some orderliness to the process, and they would be able to resolve that evidentiary question.
Even more complex is the evidentiary question of whether either approach is likely to produce greater security; or actually more likely to lead to the people's demise.
Mr. Pokorak has asked for a full evidentiary hearing on the question of Mr. Cruz's mental retardation.
Whether any of these appeals has serious evidentiary force is a question that cannot be pursued within the scope of this article; they must all the same be included in any overall assessment of the rationality of belief in an afterlife.
With the Olympic track trials set to begin July 9, and the Athens Olympics to start Aug. 13, this novel effort to ensnare cheaters is being tested under tremendous time constraints, in a high-pressure atmosphere where questions of fairness, evidentiary proof and due process will be fiercely debated.
One proto-Bayesian, David Hume, underlined the importance of considering evidentiary probability properly when he questioned the authority of religious hearsay: one shouldn't trust the supposed evidence for a miracle, he argued, unless it would be even more miraculous if the report were untrue.
Rather than finding that the judgment would increase competition, the court remarked that even "purportedly knowledgeable people" do not know what "may or may not ensue," and the court dismissed the notion of having an evidentiary hearing to explore that question because "testimonial predictions of future events" are "less reliable even than testimony as to historical fact".
