evidential support

USAGE SUMMARY

"evidential support" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in academic contexts to refer to evidence (in the form of data, research, or facts) that is used to back up a certain statement or idea. For example: "The author presented a compelling argument in favor of the new policy, bolstered with strong evidential support from the latest research."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are not entirely without evidential support.

The New York Times

They criticize the services for what they say is the lack of evidential support for their recommendations.

The New York Times

He opined that this proposal, for which there was no evidential support in terms of increased convictions, engendered a culture of suspicion that was not in keeping with the English culture of civil liberties.

The Guardian - Opinion

provides evidential support for theism.

SEP

This has some evidential support [8, 11].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The evidential support described in (R) is, of course, defeasible.

SEP

Dempster-Shafer functions are primarily employed as a logic of the evidential support for hypotheses.

SEP

The less parsimonious theories are condemned for profligacy, and lack of direct evidential support.

SEP

The eliminative nature of Bayesian evidential support doesn't require precise values for prior probabilities.

SEP

Intuitively this seems quite a reasonable way to represent how evidential support should work.

SEP

Logical concepts focus on evidential support for the truth of propositions.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidential support", clearly specify the type of evidence you are referring to (e.g., statistical data, expert opinions, experimental results) to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "evidential support" without providing specific details or references to the actual evidence. Statements like "There is evidential support for this claim" are weak without citing the sources or type of evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidential support" primarily functions as a noun phrase, serving to identify the backing or justification behind a claim or hypothesis. It is frequently used to indicate the presence of data, research, or facts that validate a particular assertion, as Ludwig AI confirms.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "evidential support" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term, particularly in academic and scientific writing, to denote the backing or justification for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage. While the phrase is versatile, it's crucial to provide specific details about the evidence to avoid overgeneralization. Alternatives like "supporting evidence" or "corroborating data" can be used for variety. Strong "evidential support" typically involves peer-reviewed research or statistically significant data, reinforcing the credibility of an argument. Remember that simply asserting "evidential support" exists is insufficient; providing concrete examples is key.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Supporting evidence

Reverses the order of the words but maintains the core meaning.

Corroborating data

Replaces "evidence" with "data" and "support" with "corroborating", implying more specific, factual backing.

Substantiating proof

Uses "proof" instead of "evidence" and "substantiating" instead of "support", suggesting a higher degree of certainty.

Validating facts

Emphasizes the factual nature of the support and uses "validating" to highlight the act of confirming.

Documented justification

Focuses on the documented nature of the support, implying a formal or recorded backing.

Empirical confirmation

Highlights the empirical nature of the support, indicating it's based on observation or experiment.

Verifiable basis

Stresses that the support can be verified or checked for accuracy.

Logical grounds

Indicates that the support is based on logical reasoning and principles.

Reasoned argument

Presents the support as a reasoned and well-thought-out argument.

Factual underpinning

Highlights the factual nature of the basis and uses "underpinning" to emphasize its foundational role.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "evidential support" in academic writing?

In academic writing, use "evidential support" by clearly stating your claim, then backing it up with specific data, research findings, or expert opinions. Always cite your sources to maintain credibility.

What are some synonyms for "evidential support" that I can use to avoid repetition?

You can use alternatives such as "supporting evidence", "corroborating data", or "substantiating proof" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "evidence support" instead of "evidential support"?

While "evidence support" might seem similar, it's not a standard or grammatically correct phrase. "Evidential support" is the established term for referring to evidence that backs up a claim.

What kind of evidence qualifies as strong "evidential support"?

Strong "evidential support" typically comes from peer-reviewed research, statistically significant data, or well-established expert consensus. The quality and relevance of the evidence are key factors.