evidential argument

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidential argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing reasoning or claims that are supported by evidence. Example: "In her thesis, she presented an evidential argument to support her claims about climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Could the inductive step in the evidential argument from evil perhaps be of that form?

SEP

Given an evidential formulation of the evidential argument from evil, what sorts of responses are possible?

SEP

Indeed, he thinks that owing to the truth of his skeptical theses "the evidential argument from evil cannot get started" (1995, 85).

SEP

Consider, then, an evidential argument from evil that focuses upon Rowe's famous case of Sue a young girl who was brutally beaten, raped, and murdered.

SEP

This so-called inductive or evidential argument from evil may be met with a response similar to the one directed against the logical argument, for the fact is that it too involves assumptions which, when brought to light, seem questionable.

SEP

But if one has strong evidence that a story is false, it is hard to see how the story on its own could possibly counter an evidential argument from evil.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

In an effort to strike a balance we here list eleven major scientific issues of the time to which Book 3 supplied answers in the sequence listed, the answers, and the most important loose ends in the reasoning offered in the evidential arguments for those answers.

SEP

He says that our cognitive resources are "radically insufficient to provide sufficient warrant to accepting [the main premise of the evidential argument]," so much so that "the inductive argument collapses" (98).

SEP

How does this bear upon evidential formulations of the argument from evil?

SEP

But, as we have seen in sections 3.3 and 3.4, there are other accounts of the type of reasoning involved in the crucial inductive step in evidential forms of the argument from evil.

SEP

Short of embracing compete inductive skepticism, then, it would seem that an appeal to human cognitive limitations cannot provide an answer to evidential versions of the argument from evil.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When constructing an "evidential argument", ensure each piece of evidence is clearly linked to the conclusion you're trying to support. Strong evidence and logical connections are essential.

Common error

Avoid building an "evidential argument" solely on anecdotal or unsubstantiated claims. Always prioritize credible and verifiable evidence from reliable sources.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidential argument" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to a type of argument where the claims are primarily supported by empirical evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Encyclopedias

10%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Unknown/unmatched sources

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evidential argument" denotes an argument primarily based on empirical evidence. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used, especially in science, encyclopedias, and news media. To construct a strong "evidential argument", prioritize credible, verifiable evidence from reliable sources, and clearly link each piece of evidence to the conclusion. Avoid anecdotal claims. Alternatives include "compelling argument", "solid argument" and "evidence-based argument". This analysis provides a comprehensive guide to using "evidential argument" effectively in various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

demonstrative argument

This alternative focuses on the clear and undeniable nature of the evidence presented.

compelling argument

This alternative highlights the persuasive and convincing nature of the argument.

solid argument

This alternative emphasizes the strength and reliability of the argument.

persuasive argument

This highlights the capability of the argument to convince the audience.

valid argument

This alternative suggests the argument adheres to logical principles.

conclusive argument

This alternative emphasizes that the argument brings a discussion or debate to an end.

evidence-based argument

The argument is explicitly grounded in factual evidence.

argument from evidence

This highlights the source of the argument's strength: the evidence itself.

supporting argument

Focuses on the role of the argument in bolstering a particular claim.

unsubstantiated argument

Highlights that the argument lacks evidential support.

FAQs

How is an "evidential argument" different from other types of arguments?

An "evidential argument" places a strong emphasis on empirical evidence as the primary basis for its claims, whereas other types of arguments may rely more on logical reasoning, philosophical principles, or emotional appeals.

What are some strategies for strengthening an "evidential argument"?

To strengthen an "evidential argument", you should use diverse and reliable sources, clearly explain the link between the evidence and your claims, address potential counterarguments, and acknowledge limitations in the data.

Can an "evidential argument" be used in everyday conversation?

Yes, while "evidential arguments" are often associated with academic or professional settings, they can also be used in everyday conversations to support your opinions and persuade others based on factual information. For example, using "supporting evidence" to back up your point.

What's the difference between an "evidential argument" and a "compelling argument"?

While both aim to persuade, an "evidential argument" prioritizes factual evidence, while a "compelling argument" focuses on being convincing and persuasive, potentially using emotional or rhetorical strategies alongside evidence.