Sentence examples for evident proposition from inspiring English sources

An evident proposition for Wodeham can be of three kinds.

If this is how we can understand an evident proposition, what then constitutes an evident judgment?

He says that the idea of "complex evidence" can be understood in two ways: either as referring to the apprehension of an evident proposition itself or to the so-called "evident judgment" which has been caused by this evident proposition.

Finally, Wodeham distinguishes this second type of evident proposition from a third type of proposition which is also categorical and necessary.

The assumption is that an evident proposition arises from, or is formulated from, certain types of simple evident apprehensions, namely, intuitive apprehensions.

What Wodeham means by an evident proposition is complicated and requires that we have a clear sense of the distinction between apprehension and judgment, which are for Wodeham two distinct and separate acts.

If other evident propositions are genuinely in conflict with (i.e., are inconsistent with) the proposition in question, those propositions cannot be evident in the highest degree.

The second degree of certainty associated with evident propositions is exemplified by a proposition that not only appears certain and inclines the judgment to assent, but is also a proposition that cannot fail to signify correctly.

Audi, for instance, writes that self evident propositions are "truths such that (a) adequately understanding them is sufficient justification for believing them …, and (b) believing them on the basis of adequately understanding them entails knowing them" (2008, 478).

Locke says that a self-evident proposition is one that "carries its own light and evidence with it, and needs no other proof: he that understands the terms, assents to it for its own sake" (1969, 139).

Ross writes, a self-evident proposition is "evident without any need of proof, or of evidence beyond itself" (1930/2002, 29), and Broad describes self-evident propositions as being "such that a rational being of sufficient insight and intelligence could see it to be true by merely inspecting it and reflecting on its terms and their mode of combination" (1936, 102 3).