Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

evident for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evident for" is grammatically correct and is commonly used in written English.
You can use "evident for" to indicate that something is clearly apparent or obvious for a particular reason or purpose. Example: It was evident for everyone to see that Sarah was nervous about her presentation because her hands were shaking and she kept fidgeting with her notes.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The obstructions have been evident for years.

News & Media

The New York Times

The gloominess has been evident for years.

News & Media

The New York Times

Problems have been evident for several years.

News & Media

The New York Times

China's patent surge has been evident for years.

News & Media

The New York Times

The trend is evident, for example, at A.T.&T.

The advantage is particularly evident for large problems.

This is evident for the PadA tree (Fig. 1c).

Science & Research

Nature

This trend has been evident for some time.

News & Media

The Guardian

This is especially evident for contamination with α-emitting radionuclides.

However, these changes were more evident for high temperature flames.

This is especially evident for rich flame cases.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "evident for" to clearly indicate the specific context or recipient for whom something is apparent. For instance, "The solution was evident for experienced programmers."

Common error

Avoid using "evident for" in overly broad statements. Instead of saying "It's evident for everyone", specify who finds it evident to maintain clarity. For example, use "It's evident for the research team" rather than the broad "everyone".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evident for" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something is easily perceived or understood in relation to a specific context or individual. Ludwig confirms its usage in various examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "evident for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that highlights the clarity or obviousness of something in relation to a specific context or individual. As noted by Ludwig, it functions as an adjectival phrase and is suitable for neutral to formal registers. While alternatives such as ""apparent to"" or ""obvious to"" may be more common, "evident for" remains a valid choice, particularly when specifying the audience for whom something is clear. Remember to avoid overly broad statements and to specify who finds something "evident" to maintain clarity. With a strong presence in scientific and news media, "evident for" demonstrates its versatility and continued relevance in English writing.

FAQs

How can I use "evident for" in a sentence?

Use "evident for" to show that something is easily seen or understood by a specific group or in a particular context. For example, "The improvement was "evident for the doctors" after reviewing the test results."

What phrases are similar to "evident for"?

Similar phrases include "apparent to", "obvious to", and "clear to depending" on the intended meaning and context.

Is it correct to say "evident to" instead of "evident for"?

While "evident for" is grammatically correct, "evident to" is a more common and often preferred alternative. Both phrases indicate that something is easily perceived, but "evident to" is generally considered more standard.

What's the difference between "evident for" and "obvious for"?

Both "evident for" and "obvious for" can be used to describe something easily understood, but "obvious" often carries a stronger connotation of being immediately and universally clear, whereas "evident" may imply that some observation or analysis is required. Use the phrase that best reflects the degree of clarity and the intended nuance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: