Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

evidences to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidences to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "evidence of" or "evidence for." Example: "The study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness of the new treatment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was very concerned and continued to be because what it evidences to me is a lack of understanding about what the framers of the Constitution were trying to put in place.

However, no enough evidences to testify.

We provide evidences to the inhomogeneous nature of these reactions.

Microscopic evidences to explain the non-Masing behaviour are presented.

So, can we still find experimental evidences to support the two simulated TF cases?

Although there are insufficient evidences to answer this question, a working assumption could be made.

Based on the interviews outcomes, we found evidences to answer our first question (RQ1).

However, these results provide evidences to support yam dioscorin after ingestion for blood pressure regulations.

We offered evidences to elucidate their growth mechanism and shape transformation.

There are evidences to suggest that wearing footwear constrains the natural barefoot motion during locomotion.

Yet the case of Turkey provides significant evidences to question these assumptions.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using "evidence of" or "evidence for" in your writing to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity. While "evidences to" appears in some contexts, it is not standard English.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "to" after "evidence" instead of the correct prepositions "of" or "for". Always double-check the preposition following "evidence" to ensure grammatical accuracy. For example, say "evidence of a crime" not "evidences to a crime".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidences to" is most commonly used as part of a prepositional phrase, often incorrectly attempting to link a claim or statement with supporting data. However, Ludwig AI identifies this usage as non-standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "evidences to" appears in various contexts, especially within scientific literature, it's considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI indicates, the accurate and preferred alternatives are "evidence of" or "evidence for". To maintain clarity and professionalism in writing, it's best to avoid "evidences to" and opt for its grammatically sound counterparts. Using incorrect grammar, despite its presence in some publications, reduces the quality of content and the correct alternatives as "evidence of" ensures both grammatical accuracy and clarity of expression.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "evidence" in a sentence?

The word "evidence" typically requires the prepositions "of" or "for". For example, "There is evidence of fraud" or "This is evidence for his claim" are both correct usages.

What can I say instead of "evidences to"?

Alternatives include "evidence of", "proof of", or "indications of", depending on the context.

Is "evidences to" grammatically correct?

No, "evidences to" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct forms are "evidence of" or "evidence for".

How does the meaning change if I use "evidence of" instead of "evidences to"?

Using "evidence of" ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity. "Evidences to" is non-standard, so using the correct phrase enhances the credibility and understandability of your writing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: